Join us on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram
 
  OCTOBER RESEARCH STORE Already a subscriber? LOG IN
AddControlToContainer_DynamicNavigation4

Appraiser News

FTC cites Louisiana board for improper C&R oversight

Email A Friend Printer Friendly Version
4 comments
Appraiser News
Wednesday, May 31, 2017

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a complaint against the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board (LREAB), alleging that the group is unreasonably restraining price competition for appraisal services in Louisiana, contrary to federal antitrust law. The complaint will be submitted to adjudication before an Administrative Law Judge, who will review it and render an initial decision, according to a release from the FTC.

In the administrative complaint, the FTC alleges that the Louisiana appraiser’s board limits the freedom of individual appraisers and their customers to engage in negotiations to set appraisal fees for real estate appraisals in Louisiana.

According to the FTC’s complaint, the Dodd-Frank Act “required appraisal management companies to pay a rate that is customary and reasonable for appraisal services performed in the market area of the property being appraised.”

The FTC alleged in its complaint that the appraisal board’s regulations exceeded the scope of the federal mandate.

“Specifically, the board required appraisal fees to equal or exceed the median fees identified in survey reports commissioned and published by the board. The board then investigated and sanctioned companies that paid fees below the specified levels. The complaint alleges that Dodd-Frank neither requires nor authorizes the restrictions that the board placed on appraisal fees,” the release said.

RELATED ARTICLES

Fee distribution to appraisers: What is really fair?

North Carolina Board discussing C&R

AMC exec says C&R regulations can be confusing


Louisiana Real Estate Appraiser Board Executive Director Bruce Unangst challenged the action in a statement.

“Respectfully, the FTC is just plain wrong,” Unangst said. “By issuing this legally faulty and factually incorrect complaint, the FTC is seeking to punish a Louisiana state agency for following federal regulatory mandates. Specifically, Dodd-Frank regulations – intended to protect consumers by ensuring the integrity of home mortgage appraisals – require that state appraisal agencies ensure Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) pay customary and reasonable fees for home appraisals.”

In the release from the FTC, though, the agency said it was using discretion granted to the FTC by the Supreme Court in its case against the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners.

 “The great preponderance of state board activity across the country occurs without significant antitrust concern, and the commission will respect the authority of such boards when they operate within the defined scope of antitrust law,” Bureau of Competition Acting Director Abbott (Tad) Lipsky said in the release

“Today’s action – the first such commission complaint against a state board since the Supreme Court decision in North Carolina Dental – shows that the commission remains vigilant and will exercise its prescribed authority when economically sound and otherwise consistent with the public interest,” Lipsky went on to say. “Nearly everyone that purchases or refinances a home in the state of Louisiana pays appraisal fees, these consumers deserve to benefit from a free market where those fees are set by competition.”

Richard Horn, founder of Richard Horn Legal, PLLC and a former special advisor to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said the FTC was enforcing in an area in which it has authority and experience.

“The FTC Act as well as the CFPB's appraisal rules say you can’t engage in anticompetitive acts, and this is an area the FTC has a lot of experience in investigating and enforcing,” he said.

Unangst said Louisiana was following what it believed the federal requirements mandated.

“It is the federal government that put these requirements on state appraisal agencies, and our bard followed these federal regulations after an open, public and transparent rulemaking process,” he said in the statement. “To now suggest that LREAB’s good-faith efforts to comply with federal law is some sort of shadowy price-fixing conspiracy is ludicrous. Congress and six financial regulatory agencies in Washington have directed Louisiana to do exactly what the FTC is now alleging is an antitrust violation.

“These claims distort the reality of the board’s conduct in an attempt to stitch together a conspiracy where none exists,” Unangst further stated. “We plan to vigorously contest these charges and defend the interests of Louisiana consumers while ensuring our state complies with federal appraisal independence regulations.”

The administrative trial is scheduled to begin Jan. 30, 2018. The case could be decided on whether the way the Louisiana board enforced the customary and reasonable fees provided a floor that companies must meet. Although the rules Louisiana’s board might not have stated the C&R fees were a minimum standard that the industry must meet, if the FTC is able to provide evidence that the enforcement of the rules created a de facto minimum standard, that could prove to be anti-competitive behavior.

“This is truly an overreach by the FTC, in direct contradiction to the federal government’s focused and consistent efforts since the 1980s to ensure the integrity of the residential mortgage market,” said W. Stephen Cannon, Constantine Cannon LLP, counsel to LREAB. 

Today's other top stories
An examination of appraisers’ non-lending skills
An analysis of the 2023 mortgage financing space
CoreLogic acquires real estate marketing firm
Clear Capital launches UDC
ASA, Valutico partner


COMMENT BOX DISCLAIMER:
October Research is not responsible for the comments posted on its websites by readers. We will do our best to remove comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments.
Comments:

Thursday, June 1, 2017
AMCs have obviously been lobbying to Trump. As it is our fee of $350 has been just about the same for almost 20 years. It's the AMCs who are getting the larger cut. I've seen docs where the appraisal fee is actually $750 to the AMC even with small, lower priced properties. I thought Team Trump would undermine the Dodd-Frank act to allow his less than ethical friends to get loans with bad credit and low equity. I didn't think they'd go after our fees. Because of tighter regulations and higher bank requirements we're adding a lot more data, research, inspections than in the past. Thank god for appraisal software or it'd take us 10x as much time to gather and formulate all the newly required data.
Thursday, June 1, 2017
Appraisers should collect their own fees at the door. Problem solved! The public will always know how much the actual fee is and who received it.
Wednesday, May 31, 2017
This is nothing more than the $ from REVAA and AMC's getting into politics and has NOTHING to do with protecting the public trust. The public is being fleeced by non-disclosure of fees and this has to be put to a stop. Nevermind that Independent Appraisers have been decimated and abused for the last 10 years and counting. STOP IT!!!

Leave your comment
CAPTCHA Validation
CAPTCHA
Code:
: 
: 
Your Email is for reporting purposes only. It will NOT be displayed.
Popularity:
This article has been viewed 6203 times.
A Twitter List by ValuationReview

Print Edition - March 20, 2023

News by Topic   Special Reports   Events   Subscribe
Conference Coverage
Appraiser News
Commercial Corner
Legal News
Market Watch
Technology Corner
 
 
2023 State of the Industry
2022 Appraisal Technology
Voice of the Appraiser
Finding and Training the Next Generation
Appraising in a New Environment
Green Appraisals
Archives
 
National Settlement Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership Summit (WLS)
Webinars
 
Subscriptions
Free Email Updates
Try a Free Edition
News by Edition   About   Other Publications    
February 6, 2023
February 20, 2023
March 6, 2023
March 20, 2023
Archives
 
Valuation Review
Contact / Editors
Social Media
Advertise
Are You An Expert?
Subscriber Agreement
 
Dodd Frank Update
RESPA News
The Title Report
The Legal Description
   
Copyright © 2002-2023 Valuation Review
An October Research, LLC publication
3046 Brecksville Road, Suite D, Richfield, OH 44286
(330) 659-6101, All Rights Reserved
www.valuationreview.com | Privacy Policy
VISIT OUR OTHER WEBSITES
> Dodd Frank Update
> RESPA News
> The Title Report
> The Legal Description
> The October Store
Loading... Loading...
Featuring:
  • Delivery 3X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive title insurance industry news
  • Recent acquisitions, mergers, real estate stats
  • Exclusive in-depth coverage of the industry's hottest stories
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Comprehensive Dodd-Frank coverage
  • The latest information from the CFPB
  • Full coverage of Congressional hearings
  • Updates on all agency actions
  • Analysis of controversial provisions
  • Release of newest studies and reports
Sign up today and...
  • Be one of the first to know where NS3 is being held
  • Learn about NS3 speakers and sessions
  • Save on registration with Super-Early Bird rates
  • Discover the networking opportunities NS3 offers
  • Find out if CE credits will be offered for your area
  • And much more
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Preview the latest RESPAnews.com Top Story
  • RESPA related headline news
  • Quote of the Week
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • Legal, regulatory and legislative information impacting the settlement services industry
  • News from HUD, Congress, state legislatures and other regulatory agencies
  • Follow the lobbying efforts of all the major national real estate services organizations.
Featuring:
  • Delivery 2X a week plus breaking news as it happens
  • The industry's only full-time newsroom
  • Relevant, up-to-date appraisal industry news
  • Covering the hottest stories and industry trends
NEWS BY TOPIC
NEWS BY EDITION
SPECIAL REPORTS
EVENTS
RESOURCES
FREE EMAIL UPDATES
ABOUT
SUBSCRIBE
Conference Coverage
Appraiser News
Commercial Corner
Legal News
Market Watch
Technology Corner
Sponsored Content
Current Edition
March 6, 2023
February 20, 2023
February 6, 2023
January 23, 2023
Archives
2023 State of the Industry
2022 Voice of the Appraiser
Appraisal Technology
Real Estate Compliance Outlook
Best Practices
Finding & Training the Next Gen
Archives
National Settlement
Services Summit (NS3)
Women's Leadership
Summit (WLS)
Webinars
2023 Economic Forecast Series
Compliance Series
Manufactured Housing
Appraising Office Space Today
CFPB Unconstitutionally funded?
Eminent Domain
Move to ANSI Standards
Keys For Operational Efficiency
New DEI Regulations
Drones Do's and Don'ts
How to be an Expert Witness
Webinar Archives
Executive Interview Series
Social Media
Valuation Review
Contact Us
Advertise
Are You An Expert
Subscriber Agreement